Associations of nutrition impact symptoms with dietary intake and eating-related distress in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no definition of nutrition impact symptoms (NISs) in cancer care. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence on the associations of NISs with dietary intake and eating-related distress (ERD) in advanced cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the associations of NISs with dietary intake and ERD in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: This study entailed a secondary analysis of a multicenter self-reported questionnaire designed to develop measurements that assess ERD experienced by patients. Participants evaluated their dietary intake and 19 symptoms regarded as NISs using a 10-point scale. To determine the association between dietary intake and the number of NISs with a score ≥4, estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the logistic regression model were calculated. Furthermore, to assess the association between ERD and the number of NISs with a score ≥4, multiple regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were included in the analysis. The higher the number of NISs with a score ≥4, the lower the dietary intake tended to be. In the logistic regression model, significantly higher adjusted ORs than in the no NISs with a score ≥4 group were observed in the 4-6 NISs group, 7-9 NISs group, and 10 or more group (0.19 [95% CI, 0.07-0.52], p = 0.001; 0.11 [95% CI, 0.03-0.42], p = 0.001; 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.36], p = 0.002, respectively). In the multiple regression analysis, the number of NISs with a score ≥4 was identified as one of the factors significantly associated with ERD. CONCLUSIONS: Having 4 or more NISs with a score ≥4 was shown to be predictive of the likelihood of reduced dietary intake. Furthermore, the higher the number of NISs with a score ≥4, the more likely the eating-related quality of life was impaired in advanced cancer.

Impacts of fluid retention on prognostic abilities of cachexia diagnostic criteria in cancer patients with refractory cachexia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The international cancer cachexia criteria with a cutoff of 5% weight loss (WL) was proposed in Western patients. The Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) developed new criteria in Asian patients. The AWGC criteria are not cancer-specific and employ a cutoff of 2% WL. However, it is unclear whether both criteria are useful in patients with very advanced cancer because WL can be underestimated owing to fluid retention. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impacts of fluid retention on the prognostic abilities of both criteria in cancer patients with weeks of survival. METHODS: This study involved a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria constrained the study to adult patients with advanced cancer. Patients were divided into Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups using the international criteria and AWGC criteria. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and by conducting univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were included in the analysis. Using the international criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.55 and 0.18, respectively. Using the AWGC criteria, the p-values for the log-rank test and stratified log-rank test for the mixed patients with and without fluid retention were 0.38 and 0.12, respectively. Without considering the impacts of fluid retention, no significant differences were observed between the Non-cachexia and Cachexia groups for both criteria. After adjusting for the status of fluid retention, significantly higher risks of mortality were not observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the Cachexia group compared with the Non-cachexia group, for both criteria. However, significant associations were observed between fluid retention and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The international criteria and AWGC criteria lost their prognostic abilities in cancer patients with weeks of survival. Since measurements of %WL were significantly confounded by fluid retention, fluid retention-adjusted criteria for cachexia need to be developed for cancer patients with refractory cachexia.

Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach to understand how registered dietitians implemented computed tomography skeletal muscle assessments in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to adopt valid techniques to assess skeletal muscle (SM) in clinical practice. SM can be precisely quantified from computed tomography (CT) images. This study describes how registered dietitians (RDs), trained to quantify SM from CT images, implemented this technique in clinical practice. METHODS: This was an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with a quantitative and a qualitative phase. RDs collected data describing how they implemented CT SM assessments in clinical practice, followed by a focus group exploring barriers and enablers to using CT SM assessments. RESULTS: RDs (N = 4) completed 96 CT SM assessments, with most (94%, N = 90/96) taking <15 min to complete. RDs identified reduced muscle mass in 63% (N = 45/72) of men and 71% (N = 17/24) of women. RDs used results of CT SM assessments to increase protein composition of the diet/nutrition support, advocate for initiation or longer duration of nutrition support, coordinate nutrition care, and provide nutrition education to patients and other health service providers. The main barriers to implementing CT SM assessments in clinical practice related to cumbersome health system processes (ie, CT image acquisition) and challenges integrating CT image analysis software into the health system computing environment. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest RDs found CT SM assessments positively contributed to their nutrition care practice, particularly in completing nutrition assessments and in planning, advocating for, and implementing nutrition interventions. Use of CT SM assessments in clinical practice requires innovative IT solutions and strategies to support skill development and use in clinical nutrition care.

The barriers to interprofessional care for cancer cachexia among Japanese healthcare providers: A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a severe complication of advanced malignancy, with few therapeutic options. To promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia, healthcare providers' needs should be addressed in detail. This pre-planned subgroup analysis of the Global Educational Needs Evaluation: a systemic interprofessional study in cancer cachexia (GENESIS-CC) survey aimed to identify barriers to interprofessional care of cancer cachexia in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide survey was electronically conducted for healthcare providers in oncological or general healthcare facilities from January to March 2021 in Japan. The Japanese Regional Advisory Board developed a barrier scoring system with 33 from the 58 original survey items to quantify six domains of barriers: (1) lack of confidence, (2) lack of knowledge, (3) barriers in personal practice, (4) barriers in perception, (5) barriers in team practice and (6) barriers in education. The largest possible barrier score was set at 100 points. We compared the scores by profession. RESULTS: A total of 1227 valid responses were obtained from 302 (24.6%) physicians, 252 (20.5%) pharmacists, 236 (19.2%) nurses, 218 (17.8%) dietitians, 193 (15.7%) rehabilitation therapists and 26 (2.0%) other professionals. Overall, 460 (37.5%) were not very or at all confident about cancer cachexia care, 791 (84.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that care was influenced by reimbursement availability and 774 (81.9%) did not have cancer cachexia as a mandatory curriculum. The largest mean barrier score (± standard deviation) was 63.7 ± 31.3 for education, followed by 55.6 ± 21.8 for team practice, 43.7 ± 32.5 for knowledge, 42.8 ± 17.7 for perception and 36.5 ± 16.7 for personal practice. There were statistically significant interprofessional differences in all domains (P < 0.05), especially for pharmacists and nurses with the highest or second highest scores in most domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve the educational system and team practices of cancer cachexia for most Japanese healthcare providers, especially pharmacists and nurses. Our study suggests the need to reform the mandatory educational curriculum and reimbursement system on cancer cachexia to promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia in Japan.

Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update.

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Current Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Cachexia: A Pathophysiologic Approach.

Significant progress in our understanding of cancer cachexia has occurred in recent years. Despite these advances, no pharmacologic agent has achieved US Food and Drug Administration approval for this common and highly morbid syndrome. Fortunately, improved understanding of the molecular basis of cancer cachexia has led to novel targeted approaches that are in varying stages of drug development. This article reviews two major thematic areas that are driving these pharmacologic strategies, including those targeting signal mediators at the level of the CNS and skeletal muscle. Additionally, pharmacologic strategies are being tested in combination with targeted nutrients, nutrition therapy, and exercise to treat cancer cachexia. To this end, we highlight recently published and ongoing trials evaluating cancer cachexia therapies in these specific areas.

Factors Associated With Practice of Multimodal Care for Cancer Cachexia Among Physicians and Nurses Engaging in Cancer Care.

PURPOSE: Multimodal care for cancer cachexia is needed. This study examined factors associated with practicing multimodal cachexia care among physicians and nurses engaging in cancer care. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of a survey investigating clinicians' perspectives on cancer cachexia. Data of physicians and nurses were used. Data on knowledge, skills, and confidence in multimodal cachexia care were obtained. Nine items on practicing multimodal cachexia care were evaluated. Participants were divided into two groups as practicing multimodal cachexia care (above median value for the nine items) or not. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the factors of practicing the multimodal care. RESULTS: Total of 233 physicians and 245 nurses were included. Significant differences were observed between the groups: female sex (P = .025), palliative care versus oncology specialization (P < .001), the number of clinical guidelines used (P < .001), the number of symptoms used (P = .005), training for cancer cachexia (P = .008), knowledge on cancer cachexia (P < .001), and confidence in cancer cachexia management (P < .001). Palliative care specialization (partial regression coefficient [B] = 0.85; P < .001), the number of clinical guidelines used (B = 0.44; P < .001), knowledge on cancer cachexia (B, 0.94; P < .001), and confidence in cancer cachexia management (B = 1.59; P < .001) were statistically significant in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Specialization in palliative care, specific knowledge, and confidence were associated with the practice of multimodal care for cancer cachexia.

Adverse effects of systemic cancer therapy on skeletal muscle: myotoxicity comes out of the closet.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Systemic cancer therapy-associated skeletal muscle wasting is emerging as a powerful impetus to the overall loss of skeletal muscle experienced by patients with cancer. This review explores the clinical magnitude and biological mechanisms of muscle wasting during systemic cancer therapy to illuminate this adverse effect. Emerging strategies for mitigation are also discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical findings include precise, specific measures of muscle loss over the course of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. All these therapeutic classes associate with quantitatively important muscle loss, independent of tumor response. Parallel experimental studies provide understanding of the specific molecular basis of wasting, which can include inhibition of protein synthesis, proliferation and differentiation, and activation of inflammation, reactive oxygen species, autophagy, mitophagy, apoptosis, protein catabolism, fibrosis and steatosis in muscle. Strategies to mitigate these muscle-specific adverse effects of cancer therapy remain in the earliest stages of development. SUMMARY: The adverse side effect of cancer therapy on skeletal muscle has been largely ignored in the development of cancer therapeutics. Given the extent to which loss of muscle mass and function can bear on patients' function and quality of life, protection/mitigation of these side effects is a research priority.

Prediction of whole body composition utilizing cross-sectional abdominal imaging in pediatrics.

BACKGROUND: Although body composition is an important determinant of pediatric health outcomes, we lack tools to routinely assess it in clinical practice. We define models to predict whole-body skeletal muscle and fat composition, as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in pediatric oncology and healthy pediatric cohorts, respectively. METHODS: Pediatric oncology patients (≥5 to ≤18 years) undergoing an abdominal CT were prospectively recruited for a concurrent study DXA scan. Cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue at each lumbar vertebral level (L1-L5) were quantified and optimal linear regression models were defined. Whole body and cross-sectional MRI data from a previously recruited cohort of healthy children (≥5 to ≤18 years) was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Eighty pediatric oncology patients (57% male; age range 5.1-18.4 y) were included. Cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue at lumbar vertebral levels (L1-L5) were correlated with whole-body lean soft tissue mass (LSTM) (R2 = 0.896-0.940) and fat mass (FM) (R2 = 0.874-0.936) (p < 0.001). Linear regression models were improved by the addition of height for prediction of LSTM (adjusted R2 = 0.946-0.971; p < 0.001) and by the addition of height and sex (adjusted R2 = 0.930-0.953) (p < 0.001)) for prediction of whole body FM. High correlation between lumbar cross-sectional tissue areas and whole-body volumes of skeletal muscle and fat, as measured by whole-body MRI, was confirmed in an independent cohort of 73 healthy children. CONCLUSION: Regression models can predict whole-body skeletal muscle and fat in pediatric patients utilizing cross-sectional abdominal images.

Association between Consultation by a Comprehensive Integrated Palliative Care Program and Quality of End-of-Life Care in Patients with Advanced Cancer in Edmonton, Canada.

Literature assessing the impact of palliative care (PC) consultation on aggressive care at the end of life (EOL) within a comprehensive integrated PC program is limited. We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced cancer who received oncological care at a Canadian tertiary center, died between April 2013 and March 2014, and had access to PC consultation in all healthcare settings. Administrative databases were linked, and medical records reviewed. Composite score for aggressive EOL care was calculated, assigning a point for each of the following: ≥2 emergency room visits, ≥2 hospitalizations, hospitalization >14 days, ICU admission, and chemotherapy administration in the last 30 days of life, and hospital death. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for age, sex, income, cancer type and PC consultation for ≥1 aggressive EOL care indicator. Of 1414 eligible patients, 1111 (78.6%) received PC consultation. In multivariable analysis, PC consultation was independently associated with lower odds of ≥1 aggressive EOL care indicator (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38−0.65, p < 0.001). PC consultation >3 versus ≤3 months before death had a greater effect on lower aggressive EOL care (mean composite score 0.59 versus 0.88, p < 0.001). We add evidence that PC consultation is associated with less aggressive care at the EOL for patients with advanced cancer.

Body composition and Crohn's disease behavior: Is adiposity the main game changer?

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between body composition upon diagnosis and complicated phenotypes and time until surgery in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients with CD who had a computed tomography enterography or a magnetic resonance enterography performed ≤6 mo of diagnosis. Skeletal muscle and visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue cross-sectional areas were determined with computed tomography or magnetic resonance images at the third lumbar vertebral level, processed with the sliceOmatic (TomoVison, Magog, QC, Canada) and ABACS plugin. RESULTS: We included 63 patients: 33 (52%) men, median age 35 y. Disease location (L) and behavior (B) according to the Montreal classification were L1 (ileal disease) = 28 (44%), L2 (colonic disease) = 13 (21%), L3(ileocolonic disease) = 18 (28%), L1 + L4 (ileal and isolated upper disease) = 1 (2%), L3 + L4 (ileocolonic and isolated upper disease) = 3 (5%), B1 (non-stricturing) = 39 (62%), B2 (stricturing) = 11 (17%), and B3 (penetrating)= 13 (21%); 20 (32%) patients had perianal disease. Visceral obesity was present in 12 (19%) patients and was associated with higher age of CD onset (median 60 versus 34 y; P = 0.002) and complicated disease behavior (B2 and B3) (66.7% versus 31.7%; P = 0.021). After adjusting for age and perianal disease, total adipose tissue was associated with a 4% increase in the odds of complicated behavior per 10 cm2 of total adipose tissue (odds ratio [OR] = 1.004; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.008; P = 0.043). Median follow-up time was 3.35 y, during which 15 (24%) of patients underwent abdominal surgery. Visceral obesity was associated with 5.10-times higher risk of abdominal surgery (95% CI, 1.52-17.09; P = 0.008); after adjusting for disease behavior, visceral obesity maintained a near-significant association with a 2.90-times higher risk of surgery (95% CI, 0.83-10.08; P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Total fat was associated with complicated disease phenotype and visceral obesity, with higher risk of abdominal surgery and shorter time until surgery.

Development and validation of questionnaires for eating-related distress among advanced cancer patients and families.

BACKGROUND: Eating-related distress (ERD) is one type of psychosocial distress among advanced cancer patients and family caregivers. Its alleviation is a key issue in palliative care; however, there is no validated tool for measuring ERD. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to validate tools for evaluating ERD among patients and family caregivers. The study consisted of a development and validation/retest phase. In the development phase, we made preliminary questionnaires for patients and family caregivers. After face validity and content validity, we performed an exploratory factor analysis and discussed the final adoption of items. In the validation/retest phase, we examined factor validity with an exploratory factor analysis. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between the questionnaire for patients, the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia Cachexia Subscale (FAACT ACS) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cachexia 24 (EORTC QLQ-CAX24) and Pearson's correlation coefficients between the questionnaire for family caregivers and the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) for concurrent validity. We calculated Cronbach's alpha coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for internal consistency and test-retest reliability. We performed the Mann-Whitney U test between the questionnaires and cancer cachexia based on criteria from the international consensus for known-group validity. RESULTS: In the development phase, 162 pairs of patients and family caregivers were asked to participate, and 144 patients and 106 family caregivers responded. In the validation/retest phase, 333 pairs of patients and family caregivers were asked to participate, and 234 patients and 152 family caregivers responded. Overall, 183 patients and 112 family caregivers did the retest. Seven conceptual groups were extracted for the ERD among patients and family caregivers, respectively. Patient factors 1-7 correlated with FAACT ACS (r = -0.63, -0.43, -0.55, -0.40, -0.38, -0.54, -0.38, respectively) and EORTC QLQ-CAX24 (r = 0.58, 0.40, 0.60, 0.49, 0.38, 0.59, 0.42, respectively). Family factors 1-7 correlated with CQOLC (r = -0.34, -0.30, -0.37, -0.37, -0.46, -0.42, -0.40, respectively). The values of Cronbach's alpha and ICC of each factor and all factors of patients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and 0.67 to 0.83, respectively. Those of each factor and all factors of family caregivers ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and 0.63 to 0.84, respectively. The cachexia group of patients had significantly higher scores than the non-cachexia group for each factor and all factors. CONCLUSIONS: Newly developed tools for measuring ERD experienced by advanced cancer patients and family caregivers have been validated.

Holistic multimodal care for patients with cancer cachexia and their family caregivers.

Patients with cancer cachexia frequently suffer from physical symptoms and psychological symptoms of illness, which can lead to emotional distress in patients and family caregivers. Although there is no standard care to manage cancer cachexia despite its high prevalence and negative impact on quality of life in patients and family caregivers, there is accumulating evidence showing the importance of holistic multimodal care for cancer cachexia. However, there is no agreement on the essential components of holistic multimodal care. Therefore, the aims of this review are to give an overview of what is known about the holistic multimodal care and to suggest the composition of a multidisciplinary team to achieve holistic interventions. Holistic multimodal care for cancer cachexia is defined as an approach that addresses physical health through medical, pharmacological, nutritional, and rehabilitative interventions as well as psychological, emotional, and social well-being issues according to the needs of patients and family caregivers. Moreover, an ideal multidisciplinary team is proposed to achieve holistic interventions based on patient- and family-centered care. However, the development of educational programs on cancer cachexia for both clinicians and patients and family caregivers is needed. Furthermore, measurements to assess the benefits of holistic multimodal care also need to be established.

A Multi-Site, International Audit of Malnutrition Risk and Energy and Protein Intakes in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Head Neck and Esophageal Cancer: Results from INFORM.

Patients with foregut tumors are at high risk of malnutrition. Nutrition care focuses on identifying individuals at risk of malnutrition and optimizing nutrient intake to promote the maintenance of body weight and lean body mass. This multi-center prospective, longitudinal study audited nutrition care practices related to screening for risk of malnutrition (Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form; PG-SGA SF), and nutrition interventions prescribed (route; adequacy of energy and protein intakes). Audits occurred at four time periods: baseline (before treatment) and at 2, 4, and 6 months after starting cancer treatment; 170 patients (esophageal (ESO; n = 51); head and neck (HN; n = 119)) were enrolled. Nutrition risk (PG-SGA SF score ≥ 4) was prevalent at every time period: HN (baseline: 60%; 6 months 66%) and ESO (77%; 72%). Both groups had significant (p < 0.001) weight losses over the 6 month audit period (HN = 13.2% ESO = 11.4%). Enteral nutrition (EN) was most likely to be prescribed at 2 months for HN and at 4 and 6 months for ESO. Target prescribed energy and protein intakes were not met with any nutrition intervention; although adequacy was highest for those receiving EN. Nutrition care practices differed for HN and ESO cancers and there may be time points when additional nutrition support is needed.

Identification and management of cancer cachexia in patients: Assessment of healthcare providers' knowledge and practice gaps.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia negatively impacts patient outcomes, quality of life and survival. Identification and management of cancer cachexia remains challenging to healthcare professionals (HCPs). The aim of this assessment was to identify current gaps in HCPs' knowledge and practice for identifying and managing adults with cancer-related cachexia. Results may guide development of new educational programmes to close identified gaps and improve outcomes of cancer patients. METHODS: An international assessment was conducted using a mixed-methods approach including focus group interviews with subject matter experts and an electronic survey of practising HCP. The assessment was led by the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD) and was supported by in-country collaborating organizations. RESULTS: A quantitative survey of 58 multiple-choice questions was completed by physicians, nurses dietitians and other oncology HCP (N = 2375). Of all respondents, 23.7% lacked confidence in their ability to provide care for patients with cancer cachexia. Patients with gastrointestinal, head and neck, pulmonary cancers and leukaemia/lymphoma were reported as those at highest risk for cachexia. Only 29.1% of respondents recognized a key criterion of cancer cachexia as >5% weight loss from baseline, but many (14.4%) did not utilize a standardized definition of cancer cachexia. Despite this, most clinicians (>84%) were able to identify causes of weight loss-reduced oral intake, progressive disease, side effects of therapy and disease-related inflammation. Of all respondents, 52.7% indicated newly diagnosed patients with cancer should be screened for weight loss. In practice, 61.9% reported that patient weight was systematically tracked over time, but only 1125 (47.4%) reported they weigh their cancer patients at each visit. Treatment of cachexia focused on increasing the patient's nutritional intake by oral nutritional supplements (64.2%), energy and protein fortified foods (60.3%) and counselling by a dietitian (57.1%). Whereas many respondents (37.3%) considered cachexia inevitable, most (79.2%) believed that an interprofessional team approach could improve care and that use of standardized tools is critical. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this international assessment highlight the challenges associated with the care of patients with cancer cachexia, opportunities for interventions to improve patient outcomes and areas of variance in care that would benefit from further analysis.

Rapid Standardized CT-Based Method to Determine Lean Body Mass SUV for PET-A Significant Improvement Over Prediction Equations.

In 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) studies, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is the parameter commonly used to provide a measurement of the metabolic activity of a tumor. SUV normalized by body mass is affected by the proportions of body fat and lean tissue, which present high variability in patients with cancer. SUV corrected by lean body mass (LBM), denoted as SUL, is recommended to provide more accurate, consistent, and reproducible SUV results; however, LBM is frequently estimated rather than measured. Given the increasing importance of a quantitative PET parameter, especially when comparing PET studies over time to evaluate disease response clinically, and its use in oncological clinical trials, we set out to evaluate the commonly used equations originally derived by James (1976) and Janmahasatian et al. (2005) against computerized tomography (CT)-derived measures of LBM. Methods: Whole-body 18F-FDG PET images of 195 adult patients with cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Representative liver SUVmean was normalized by total body mass. SUL was calculated using a quantitative determination of LBM based on the CT component of the PET/CT study (LBMCT) and compared against the equation-estimated SUL. Bland and Altman plots were generated for SUV-SUL differences. Results: This consecutive sample of patients undergoing usual care (men, n = 96; women, n = 99) varied in body mass (38-127 kg) and in Body Mass Index (BMI) (14.7-47.2 kg/m2). LBMCT weakly correlated with body mass (men, r2 = 0.32; women, r2 = 0.22), and thus SUV and SULCT were also weakly correlated (men, r2 = 0.24; women, r2 = 0.11). Equations proved inadequate for the assessment of LBM. LBM estimated by James' equation showed a mean bias (overestimation of LBM compared with LBMCT) in men (+6.13 kg; 95% CI 4.61-7.65) and in women (+6.32 kg; 95% CI 5.26-7.39). Janmahasatian's equation provided similarly poor performance. Conclusions: CT-based LBM determinations incorporate the patient's current body composition at the time of a PET/CT study, and the information garnered can provide care teams with information with which to more accurately determine FDG uptake values, allowing comparability over multiple scans and treatment courses and will provide a robust basis for the use of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) in clinical trials.

Impact of Early Jejunostomy Tube Feeding on Clinical Outcome and Parameters of Body Composition in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Multimodal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition commonly affects patients with esophageal cancer and has the potential to negatively influence treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early (preoperative) jejunostomy tube feeding (JTF) in nutritionally 'high risk' patients receiving multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients were selected to undergo early JTF during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in accordance with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society guidelines. Clinical outcomes were compared with patients who received routine JTF from the time of esophagectomy. Body composition was determined from computed tomography (CT) images acquired at diagnosis, after nCRT, and ≥ 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 81 patients received early JTF and 91 patients received routine JTF. Patients who received early JTF had lower body mass index (BMI; 26.1 ± 4.6 vs. 28.4 ± 4.9; p = 0.002), greater weight loss, and worse performance status at diagnosis. Groups were otherwise well-matched for baseline characteristics. Rate of re-intubation (8.8% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.027), pulmonary embolism (5.0% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.046), and 90-day mortality (10.0% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.010) were worse in the early JTF group; however, overall survival was equivalent for both the early and routine JTF groups (p = 0.053). Wide variation in the degree of preoperative muscle loss and total adipose tissue loss was observed across the entire study cohort. Relative preoperative muscle and adipose tissue loss in patients with early and routine JTF was equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients determined to be at 'high risk' of malnutrition, early JTF may prevent excess morbidity after esophagectomy with an associated relative preservation of parameters of body composition.

Higher subcutaneous adipose tissue radiodensity is associated with increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Association between sarcopenia and mortality in cirrhosis is well recognised; however, little is known about the clinical implications of adipose tissue radiodensity, indicative of biological features. This study aimed to determine an association between high subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) radiodensity and survival, compare the prevalence of high SAT radiodensity between healthy population and patients with cirrhosis, and identify an association between computed tomography (CT)-measured SAT radiodensity and histological characteristics. Methods: Adult patients with cirrhosis (n = 786) and healthy donors (n = 129) with CT images taken as part of the liver transplant (LT) assessment were included. Abdominal SAT biopsies (1-2 g) were harvested from the incision site at the time of LT from 12 patients with cirrhosis. Results: The majority of patients were male (67%) with a mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 15 ± 8. SAT radiodensity above -83 HU in females (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.85, p = 0.006) and higher than -74 HU in males (sHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, p = 0.02) was associated with the highest mortality risk after adjusting for confounders in competing risk analysis. The frequency of high SAT radiodensity was 26% for those with cirrhosis, compared with 2% in healthy donors (p <0.001). An inverse correlation was found between SAT radiodensity and the mean cross-sectional area of SAT adipocytes (r = -0.67, p = 0.02). Shrunken, smaller adipocytes with expanded interstitial space were predominant in patients with high SAT radiodensity, whereas larger adipocytes with a thin rim of cytoplasm were observed in patients with low SAT radiodensity (744 ± 400 vs. 1,521 ± 1,035 µm2, p <0.001). Conclusion: High SAT radiodensity frequently presents and is associated with a higher mortality in cirrhosis. SAT morphological rearrangement in patients with high SAT radiodensity might indicate diminished lipid stores and alterations in tissue characteristics. Lay summary: Poor quality of subcutaneous adipose tissue (fat under the skin) is associated with higher mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Fat cells are smaller in patients with poor adipose tissue quality.

Assessing dynamic change in muscle during treatment of patients with cancer: Precision testing standards.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography images acquired during routine cancer care provide an opportunity to determine body composition with accuracy and precision. Quantification of skeletal muscle is of interest owing to its association with clinical outcomes. However, the standards of precision testing considered mandatory in other areas of radiology are lacking from the literature in this area. We aim to describe the change in skeletal muscle over time at different anatomical levels using the precision error. METHODS: Thirty-eight male patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were evaluated at two time points encompassing their treatment plan. Precision testing consisted of analyzing the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the skeletal muscle and total adipose tissue of 76 CT studies (38 images at baseline repeated twice and 38 follow-up images repeated twice) measured by a skilled observer. The % coefficient of variation (%CV), the root-mean-square standard deviation (RMS SD) and the corresponding 95% least significant change (LSC) were calculated for four anatomical levels: upper arm, thigh, chest and abdomen. RESULTS: The median time between scans was 223.6 (SD 31.2) days. Precision error (% CV) for total skeletal muscle cross sectional area was 0.86% for upper arm, 0.26% for thigh, 0.39% for chest and 0.63% for abdomen. The corresponding LSC values in upper arm, thigh, chest and abdomen were 2.4%, 0.7%, 1.1% and 1.8%, respectively. Based on the LSC for RMS SD, patients were classified in two categories according to muscle cross-sectional area: stable (i.e within LSC value) or gained and loss. To compare the four anatomical levels, the proportion of patients with muscle loss exceeding the LSC value was 74.3% for arm, 86.2% for thigh, 82.9% for chest and 76.3% for abdomen. For these same anatomic regions, the mean muscle loss for those patients classified below the LSC was 14.6% (SD 9.3), 13.4% (SD 7.8), 11.9% (SD 6.5) and 11.6% (SD 5.5), respectively. Only the loss of muscle area was significantly higher in thigh (p = 0.023), using L3 as the reference level. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the uniform use of a standard precision test when reporting muscle change over time. LSC values vary from 0.7 to 2.4% depending on anatomic site; with the lowest precision error to detect change in the thigh. Based on this analysis, muscle wasting appears to be systemic and while present in limbs and trunk is significantly higher in the thigh than in the chest, abdomen or upper arm.

Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Multimodal Interventions for Cancer Cachexia.

Background: Holistic multimodal interventions have not been established for cancer cachexia. The beliefs and perceptions of health care professionals (HCPs) based on their experiences influence the interventions. Objectives: HCPs' knowledge, perceptions, and practices in cancer cachexia management were evaluated. Design/Setting/Subjects/Measurements: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted that focused on the perspectives of HCPs on interventions in 451 designated cancer hospitals across Japan. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: Among 2255 participants, 1320 responded (58.5%), and 1188 in 258 institutes were included in the analysis. The current international definition of cancer cachexia is not commonly known and recent clinical practice guidelines have not been widely adopted. More than 50% of participants considered ≥5% weight loss in six months and ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) 2-4 to be cancer cachexia, whereas 50% answered that there was no relationship between life expectancy and cancer cachexia. Participants tended to consider it important to initiate nutritional and exercise interventions before cancer cachexia becomes apparent. The majority of participants recognized the importance of holistic multimodal interventions, particularly for the management of physical and psychological symptoms; however, only 20% reported that they educated patients and families. Furthermore, 33% of participants considered themselves to have provided patients and families with sufficient nutritional and exercise interventions and evidence-based information. Conclusion: The results reveal that HCPs are not regularly providing education and emotional support to patients and families suffering from cancer cachexia. The results also show the need for education for HCPs to enhance implementation of holistic multimodal interventions for cancer cachexia.